The Forgotten Prejudice :: social issues

The Forgotten Prejudice Partiality is characterized most likely as the abuse of an individual or individuals because of a biased predisposition. In Britain today there is a fixation on not being supremacist, and less significantly, not being chauvinist. Anyway wild homophobia despite everything exists and noone wants to censure. So here we go..... Homophobia; the word itself is a simbol of the contrast between the assessments of society on the abuse of gay individuals contrasted with the abuse of ladies or ethnic minority gatherings. The word proposes an unreasonable dread, as opposed to a wrongdoing or partiality as prejudice sexism and ageism do. Being gay is a characteristic thing. Having watched the nauseating partialities that appear to go connected at the hip with homosexuality in our general public, I envision that noone would CHOOSE to be gay. You can't pick who you become hopelessly enamored with. At the point when you hit pubescence, you end up pulled in to individuals. You don't intentionally choose to be straight. Along these lines I reason that you don't intentionally choose to be gay. At long last, numerous types of wild creatures (counting giraffes, monkeys and winged creatures) have shown gay conduct. Hence homosexuality happens in nature.Some individuals guarantee that being gay is unnatural. Obviously they are incorrect. Numerous individuals base their declarations that being gay isn't right or somehow or another freak on their strict convictions. This I find incredable. God makes man in his picture, he has a reason for every one of us and so on. Why at that point would he make a few people gay if being gay is heinous to him. On the off chance that homosexuality is a wrongdoing, and God makes a few people gay, what sort of mean stunt is that? (I realize that that is an extremely oversimplified method of saying it). God evidently cherishes everybody. Would he need the ostracision of a portion of his youngsters as a result of their sexual preferance? A few people guarantee that there is something 'amiss' with the brains of gay individuals, as such proposing that they are intellectually upset or strange. On the off chance that this was valid, would it be a reason for their abuse? The facts may confirm that the cerebrum of a gay individual might be diverse somehow or another from the brain of a straight individual (I dont know) But the psyche of a man is distinctive to that of a lady. As I trust we as a whole observe, various doesn't mean mediocre. What's more, wouldnt it be God that is liable for those distinctions?